Summary:
**Summary**
This commit adds `torch::jit::RegisterBackend`, an API that allows
external backends to be registered for the execution of JIT subgraphs
outside the JIT interpreter. In order to register an external backend,
one must extend the provided abstract class `PyTorchBackendInterface` and provide
two additional functions: one that creates an instance of the aforementioned subclass
of `PyTorchBackendInterface`, and another that preprocesses a `ScriptModule` so that
it can run on the backend. Then, a `ScriptModule` that can compile and execute a given
JIT subgraph using the functions provided at registration time is generated
for each registered backend.
**Testing**
This commit adds a unit test that uses a minimal test backend
to make sure that the registration endpoint and generated
`ScriptModule` work.
```
$ python test/test_jit.py TestBackends
Fail to import hypothesis in common_utils, tests are not derandomized
.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.183s
OK
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35833
Differential Revision: D21231955
Pulled By: SplitInfinity
fbshipit-source-id: 452db1123d0e5d83f97fe5da8a00fdfdb50dbef9
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37472
Our convention is for `findX` to return an optional version and `getX`
to assert that the X is there. Fix up `getMethod` to be consistent with
this convention.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D21297543
Pulled By: suo
fbshipit-source-id: b40f56231cc8183e61bbb01fe5c0c113bcb6464d
Summary:
We were previously only looking at class attributes, so that didn't include methods etc, and would silently give wrong semantics. This makes hasAttr go through the same resolution as our other attribute lookups.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37424
Differential Revision: D21282633
Pulled By: eellison
fbshipit-source-id: 8e970f365c2740d137a02331739c2ed93747b918
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37655
Add override name for aten::tensor and aten::as_tensor.
These two ops are used in NLU model, and they will included them in lite interpreter
Test Plan: verified model can be loaded correctly
Reviewed By: iseeyuan
Differential Revision: D21346142
fbshipit-source-id: 05ff4d9e0bcf7f4f9a30d95ca81aef9c3f6b0990
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/36953
Add support for generic lists as a constant. generic dicts & tuples are already implemented. This is a pretty common pattern and cuts down on the number of non-tensor nodes executed in interpolate tests.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D21160761
Pulled By: eellison
fbshipit-source-id: 1e6b7b25b7580f09067794772d44e615601c60c4
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/32684
Previously we have `clone` and `clone_instance`, where `clone` will clone both type
and value, and `clone_instance` only clone the value, both of them are shallow copies.
We need to re-evaluate whether we should expose them as a user facing API.
I think we should hide `clone`, but `clone_instance` might be useful as well, especially
when we are copying a model with very large weights, people might just want to do shallow copy.
This PR adds a `deepcopy` that might be useful as a user API, which deep copies the values, including
Tensor, but we didn't deepcopy `Blob`, `Capsule`, `Future` or `PyObject`.
For more discussions please see the following issue.
fixes: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/32519
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D21220756
fbshipit-source-id: 476bf11fe82c08fac36e7457879a09f545ffdc5e
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/36727
Looks like this was renamed by accident in 0cbd7fa46f
Test Plan:
Unit test.
Lint.
Differential Revision: D21076697
Pulled By: dreiss
fbshipit-source-id: dbd18cb41c7b26479984a7a7b12ad41a4c5b7658
Summary:
With https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35562, we are running peephole optimization on inlining to reduce the number of nodes that are copied.
The tracer encodes the sizes in the graph like:
```
graph(%0 : Double(7)):
%1 : Function = prim::Constant[name="tensor_size"]()
%2 : Tensor = prim::CallFunction(%1, %0)
return (%2)
```
however people would like to reuse the graph with different shapes so running size invalidations would invalidate that. long term it might be better for the tracer to not include shape information but there are downstream users of that.
Separates out FuseAddMM from peephole so that now there is a single `disable_size_optimizations` parameter, and onnx explicitly invokes fuseaddmm.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/36404
Differential Revision: D20968974
Pulled By: eellison
fbshipit-source-id: 56f8f1699e3b0adeeccdfd5a67bb975fd41a2913
Summary:
Since aten;:__interpolate is removed in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/34514, we need a pass replace interpolate function with aten::__interpolate for ONNX export.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35744
Reviewed By: hl475
Differential Revision: D20907041
Pulled By: houseroad
fbshipit-source-id: f2d2cdfec47389245c50f538267124eedf682adf
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/36277
This PR introduce a flag to the tracer that guard the risky behaviors
like adding list/dict as output of the tracer. Currently to ensure not
BC breaking user, we throw warning if the tracer output is list, and
will throw error when the tracer output is dict to enforce using this
flag (next PR)
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20998157
Pulled By: wanchaol
fbshipit-source-id: 0d2c55f1a263a48b1b92dd6ad54407815e0a6f72
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35170
Looks like this was renamed by accident in 0cbd7fa46f
Test Plan:
Unit test.
Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20783298
fbshipit-source-id: 8fcc146284af022ec1afe8d651baf6721b190ad3
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35630
Prefix underscored for now because the semantics of this method can be
confusing. It adds a new attribute to the *type*, which can be shared
by several objects.
Test Plan:
Next diff in stack uses it, and has unit tests.
Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20904253
fbshipit-source-id: dcbf60eacf0e0e075c19238165aa33954aa73b5f
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35913
The pass itself is still disabled by default, but with this change we
don't need to register it as a custom pass anymore. It allows us to
control its behavior with env variables more easily.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: suo
Differential Revision: D20827189
Pulled By: ZolotukhinM
fbshipit-source-id: e74d90b5e46422e7ab7bc40974a805220da50fbc
Summary:
Someone messaged me abt this when a better error msg would have solved their problem
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35888
Differential Revision: D20819538
Pulled By: eellison
fbshipit-source-id: 95d124bfd162e1747dcdf7a981703a279a5dfaa6
Summary:
**Summary:** This PR contains the infrastructure of a new CUDA fuser. This CUDA fuser is based on many of the same principles of TensorExpressions and Halide, however the implementation is ground up. The fusion pass itself is similar to the default CUDA fuser, however, it has undergone some refactoring and is using the new code generation infrastructure. For those who are interested in how the code generation in this PR works, I would recommend reviewing _test/cpp/jit/test_gpu_fusion.cpp_ as well as the long comment section at the beginning of _torch/csrc/jit/codegen/cuda/transform_replay.h_ One of the largest differences between our approach and that of TVM/Halide, is the concept of "TensorView". TensorView from a high level should be thought of similarly to how we think of working with Tensors in PyTorch. It's an N-D object which can undergo transformations that change its dimensionality. Dimensionality changes are done through the operations split/merge/reorder/computeAt. These transformations are similar to split/fuse/reorder/compute_at of TVM, they modify how a tensor is iterated over to generate GPU code. Interestingly, in our scheme these transformations are applied to tensors and only impact how that tensor is generated.
**Warning:** This PR is purposefully not feature complete with the current fuser. We wanted to separate out the infrastructure from the fusion capabilities. Once in, smaller incremental PRs will be submitted to expand capabilities of the fuser.
**Short term goals:**
Parity with current CUDA fuser (including performance):
- Dynamic shapes (no recompilation)
- Implicit handling of braodcast (broadcasted tensors are treated as tensors of the braodcasted size in the generated code)
- Dropout
**Mid-term goals:**
- Transposes fused with pointwise operations where transpose involves only 2 axes (across the fused operation).
- 1-D reductions fused with pointwise operations
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/34785
Reviewed By: ZolotukhinM
Differential Revision: D20650977
Pulled By: soumith
fbshipit-source-id: ee39c95a880e1b9822e874ed4cc180971572bf63
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35720
When modules are saved, all relevant types are serialized according to
their qualified name with a compilation unit. Since qualified names are
guaranteed to be unique within a compilation unit, this normally works
fine.
On load, all types are registered in a compilation unit owned by the
script::Module. Type names are not unique across compilation units, so
if you load two modules with colliding type names, make them submodules
of yet another module, and save that module, there is the potential of a
name collision. See the added tests for examples if that description is
confusing.
The solution is to unique type names when serializing code by mangling
them if we detect a name collision.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20749423
Pulled By: suo
fbshipit-source-id: a8827ff1d4a89f3e7964dbbb49b4381863da3e6a
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35586
This pass fuses the choose_qparams-quant-dequant sequence
Fusion for weight tensor is the same as static quant.
Test Plan:
python test/test_quantize_script.py
Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20755680
fbshipit-source-id: b7443770642b6e6fa0fa9da8a44637e9b2d4df70
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35448
Add _choose_qparams_per_tensor which returns scale and zero_point similar to the dynamic quantization in the operator
Test Plan:
python test/test_quantize_script.py
Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20755679
fbshipit-source-id: c9066d8f1bb3e331809be26c4be806faafc9b981
Summary:
Fixes#29035
Previously we were missing a case for namedtuples in our Python value resolution logic, so they were just getting resolved as regular Python values, hence the `OSError`s in the linked issue
](https://our.intern.facebook.com/intern/diff/20653496/)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35409
Pulled By: driazati
Differential Revision: D20653496
fbshipit-source-id: b5db1a11e918175aa02fda92993d233695417c56
Summary:
This commit allows one to use an environment variable to enable the fuser in torch/csrc/jit/tensorexpr/
```
PYTORCH_TENSOREXPR=1 python benchmark.py
```
This commit also changes the registration to happen by default, removing the requirement for the python exposed "_jit_register_tensorexpr_fuser"
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35341
Reviewed By: ZolotukhinM
Differential Revision: D20676348
Pulled By: bwasti
fbshipit-source-id: 4c997cdc310e7567c03905ebff72b3e8a4c2f464
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35115
This commit runs the newly added tools/clang_format.py on the JIT
codebase and includes all of the formatting changes thus produced.
Testing:
Ran the script, CI.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: eellison
Differential Revision: D20568523
Pulled By: SplitInfinity
fbshipit-source-id: e09bdb982ccf090eecfb7c7b461b8d0681eef82b
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/33186
This helps create larger functional graphs. It has the potential to increase memory use, so in order to land this on by default we would probably also do a reuse of buffers pass.
This is currently O(n * | Removed Nodes | ) because we have to rebuild the alias Db each time we make a change. This pass is critical to creating functional graphs, so this might be a compelling use case to build incremental updates to alias Db.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20603189
Pulled By: eellison
fbshipit-source-id: 105db52bf38e02188ca6df6d36294466d3309a0a
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/33020
This is a pass to create functional blocks. The other PRs in the stack help avoid some of the limitations that are are often found in graphs. It's possible that this would work well with a graph that is frozen. Follow up work items that will help this pass:
- We don't currently have any capacity in alias analysis to tell whether a Value that came from the wildcard set "re-escapes" back into the wildcard set.
- More comments on the semantics of the graph and correctness conditions
- We could consider using dynamic dag if the perf of this is a limitation.
- potential make Functional Graphs Functional Blocks instead, so that we do not repeatedly copy constants, also to make IR read easier.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20603188
Pulled By: eellison
fbshipit-source-id: 6822a6e65f4cc2676f8f6445fe8aa1cb858ebeeb