Use onnxscript apis for 2.7.
Remove reference to `torchlib_opset()` and `torchlib_opset_version()` which were removed in the onnxscript 2.7 apis. These apis were removed because torchlib in onnxscript will always stay on opset 18. Future opset version bumps will happen in pytorch core after the migration of torchlib.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/148453
Approved by: https://github.com/titaiwangms, https://github.com/shubhambhokare1
Reference: https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/formatter/black/#assert-statements
> Unlike Black, Ruff prefers breaking the message over breaking the assertion, similar to how both Ruff and Black prefer breaking the assignment value over breaking the assignment target:
>
> ```python
> # Input
> assert (
> len(policy_types) >= priority + num_duplicates
> ), f"This tests needs at least {priority+num_duplicates} many types."
>
>
> # Black
> assert (
> len(policy_types) >= priority + num_duplicates
> ), f"This tests needs at least {priority+num_duplicates} many types."
>
> # Ruff
> assert len(policy_types) >= priority + num_duplicates, (
> f"This tests needs at least {priority + num_duplicates} many types."
> )
> ```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/144546
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
Fixes#144976
Using appoach ① `IO[bytes]`, but could also try with a protocol.
## Notes:
- moved `torch.serialization.FILE_LIKE` to `torch.types.FileLike`
- Use `FileLike` annotation where it makes sense
- made sure those functions also support `os.PathLike`
- Replaced `isinstance(x, io.BytesIO)` with `isinstance(x, (io.IOBase, IO))` where appropriate.
- Replaced `BinaryIO` with `IO[bytes]` (the two ABCs are almost identical, the only difference is that `BinaryIO` allows `bytearray` input to `write`, whereas `IO[bytes]` only `bytes`)
- needed to make `torch.serialization._opener` generic to avoid LSP violations.
- skipped `torch/onnx/verification` for now (functions use `BytesIO.getvalue` which is not part of the `IO[bytes]` ABC, but it kind of seems that this is redundant, as e.g. `onnx.load` supports `str | PathLike[str] | IO[bytes]` directly...
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/144994
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang, https://github.com/Skylion007
Fix#143118
Use python_dispatcher in the type promotion pass to preserve symbolic shapes according to @angelayi 's suggestions. (Thanks!)
Tested locally. I wasn't able to create a minimal repro except for using the full model
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/144801
Approved by: https://github.com/titaiwangms
Changes:
1. Bump `ruff` from 0.7.4 to 0.8.4
2. Change `%`-formatted strings to f-string
3. Change arguments with the `__`-prefix to positional-only arguments with the `/` separator in function signature.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/143753
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
Over time, a large number of the existing type ignores have become irrelevant/unused/dead as a result of improvements in annotations and type checking.
Having these `# type: ignore` linger around is not ideal for two reasons:
- They are verbose/ugly syntatically.
- They could hide genuine bugs in the future, if a refactoring would actually introduce a bug but it gets hidden by the ignore.
I'm counting over 1500 unused ignores already. This is a first PR that removes some of them. Note that I haven't touched type ignores that looked "conditional" like the import challenge mentioned in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/60006#issuecomment-2480604728. I will address these at a later point, and eventually would enable `warn_unused_ignores = True` in the mypy configuration as discussed in that comment to prevent accumulating more dead ignores going forward.
This PR should have no effect on runtime at all.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/142325
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007, https://github.com/janeyx99
Currently there are a few type annotations that falsely state that mypy doesn't support recursive types.
Recursive type support is available in mypy for a few years already. It has been officially enabled in [version 0.991](https://mypy-lang.blogspot.com/2022/11/mypy-0990-released.html). Pyright even had support for recursive types earlier (https://github.com/microsoft/pyright/issues/569), so there is probably no reason not to model these types correctly.
This PR models these types properly now. Since this has turned a few implicit `Any` into fully typed variables that are not narrowed cleanly, a small number of type ignores were necessary.
Note that regarding the `Argument` it is desirable to model it in a covariant way (i.e. using `Sequence` and `Mapping`) instead of making it invariant unnecessarily (using `List` and `Dict`). If it were modeled invariant, it would for instance mean that a `List[Node]` would not type check as `Argument`, because invariance would mean that it really has to be a `List[Argument]` (i.e., including all the branches of the union type). Since even the name of the type "argument" strongly suggest that it is semantically used as "argument", having covariance natural anyway.
There are no chances in this PR that affect runtime behavior.
CC @Skylion007
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/142300
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang, https://github.com/Skylion007
We use nn_module_stack in unflatten to recognize when module calls begin and end. However the current format is not sufficient to detect module call boundaries when we have successive calls to the same module, because the successive instructions (end of one call, begin of next call) have the same nn_module_stack. This causes us to effectively "unroll" successive calls to a single call. This can cause problems when preserving module call signatures because the outputs of the successive calls might be concatenated in the single call.
Previously we introduced the concept of a "call index" to generate multiple graphs when unflattening, one per call. This PR pushes this concept into nn_module_stack itself. In particular, the keys of nn_module_stack now go from `key` to `key@call_index`. (In a previous attempt, https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/137457, instead values in nn_module_stack go from (fqn, type) to (fqn, type, call_index), which is BC-breaking.)
Note that we still do not have the ability to preserve module call signatures for multiple calls to the same module. But now instead of randomly crashing we give a proper error. OTOH when not preserving module call signatures we simply generate multiple calls, each with its own graph, possibly deduplicated, matching what we would do for non-successive calls.
Test Plan: Like D64014936
Differential Revision: D64136277
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/137646
Approved by: https://github.com/angelayi
op_level_debug helped to identify missing operators, and wrongly implemented operators at the time that dynamo exporter relied on nearest matching and torchlib was just created. However, right now, with dispatcher logic improved and torchlib becomes mature, we no longer need it.
PS: op-level-debug diagnostics rule is not deleted in this PR, as it auto generates lint error code, and need more time to fix. We can delete it when we retire sarif.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134961
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby
Part of #134054.
This corresponds to the pytorch mypy changes from D61493706. Updating takes so
long and touches so many files that it's impossible to land as a whole without conflicting with some other intermediate change.
So landing these 'type: ignore' for pytorch in advance of them actually being needed.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134202
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
The problem was we were shoving SymInts into the constant_args side
table. The root problem is that torch.fx.node.base_types, which we use
to determine what can be put in the graph, doesn't actually have SymInt
in it. This PR fixes base_types to include SymInt.
Test Plan:
- tests
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/131363
Approved by: https://github.com/oulgen, https://github.com/justinchuby
beartype has served us well in identifying type errors and ensuring we call internal functions with the correct arguments (thanks!). However, the value of having beartype is diminished because of the following:
1. When beartype improves support for better Dict[] type checking, it discovered typing mistakes in some functions that were previously uncaught. This caused the exporter to fail with newer versions beartype when it used to succeed. Since we cannot fix PyTorch and release a new version just because of this, it creates confusion for users that have beartype in their environment from using torch.onnx
2. beartype adds an additional call line in the traceback, which makes the already thick dynamo stack even larger, affecting readability when users diagnose errors with the traceback.
3. Since the typing annotations need to be evaluated, we cannot use new syntaxes like `|` because we need to maintain compatibility with Python 3.8. We don't want to wait for PyTorch take py310 as the lowest supported Python before using the new typing syntaxes.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/130484
Approved by: https://github.com/titaiwangms
beartype has served us well in identifying type errors and ensuring we call internal functions with the correct arguments (thanks!). However, the value of having beartype is diminished because of the following:
1. When beartype improves support for better Dict[] type checking, it discovered typing mistakes in some functions that were previously uncaught. This caused the exporter to fail with newer versions beartype when it used to succeed. Since we cannot fix PyTorch and release a new version just because of this, it creates confusion for users that have beartype in their environment from using torch.onnx
2. beartype adds an additional call line in the traceback, which makes the already thick dynamo stack even larger, affecting readability when users diagnose errors with the traceback.
3. Since the typing annotations need to be evaluated, we cannot use new syntaxes like `|` because we need to maintain compatibility with Python 3.8. We don't want to wait for PyTorch take py310 as the lowest supported Python before using the new typing syntaxes.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/130484
Approved by: https://github.com/titaiwangms
beartype has served us well in identifying type errors and ensuring we call internal functions with the correct arguments (thanks!). However, the value of having beartype is diminished because of the following:
1. When beartype improves support for better Dict[] type checking, it discovered typing mistakes in some functions that were previously uncaught. This caused the exporter to fail with newer versions beartype when it used to succeed. Since we cannot fix PyTorch and release a new version just because of this, it creates confusion for users that have beartype in their environment from using torch.onnx
2. beartype adds an additional call line in the traceback, which makes the already thick dynamo stack even larger, affecting readability when users diagnose errors with the traceback.
3. Since the typing annotations need to be evaluated, we cannot use new syntaxes like `|` because we need to maintain compatibility with Python 3.8. We don't want to wait for PyTorch take py310 as the lowest supported Python before using the new typing syntaxes.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/130484
Approved by: https://github.com/titaiwangms
