Changes in this PR:
1. Add `is_structseq` and `is_structseq_class` functions to determine a object or a class is PyStructSequence.
2. Add a generic class `structseq` which can be used as the registration key for PyStructSequence types like `namedtuple` for Named Tuple types.
3. Change `is_namedtuple` to accept subclasses of namedtuple to be namedtuple. Before this PR, only namedtuple class directly created by `collections.namedtuple` or `typing.NamedTuple` were namedtuple classes while their subclasses were not. This PR makes `is_namedtuple` return true for subclasses of namedtuple class.
Resolves#75982. New tests are included in this PR.
- #75982
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/113257
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
Changes in this PR:
1. Add `is_structseq` and `is_structseq_class` functions to determine a object or a class is PyStructSequence.
2. Add a generic class `structseq` which can be used as the registration key for PyStructSequence types like `namedtuple` for Named Tuple types.
3. Change `is_namedtuple` to accept subclasses of namedtuple to be namedtuple. Before this PR, only namedtuple class directly created by `collections.namedtuple` or `typing.NamedTuple` were namedtuple classes while their subclasses were not. This PR makes `is_namedtuple` return true for subclasses of namedtuple class.
Resolves#75982. New tests are included in this PR.
- #75982
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/113257
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
Changes in this PR:
1. Add `is_structseq` and `is_structseq_class` functions to determine a object or a class is PyStructSequence.
2. Add a generic class `structseq` which can be used as the registration key for PyStructSequence types like `namedtuple` for Named Tuple types.
3. Change `is_namedtuple` to accept subclasses of namedtuple to be namedtuple. Before this PR, only namedtuple class directly created by `collections.namedtuple` or `typing.NamedTuple` were namedtuple classes while their subclasses were not. This PR makes `is_namedtuple` return true for subclasses of namedtuple class.
Resolves#75982. New tests are included in this PR.
- #75982
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/113257
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
This enables a check that which a class which only inherits from immutable classes like str, tuple, and NamedTuple, also defined `__slots__` so they don't allocate memory unnecessarily. This also ensure contributors think about how they define their classes with subclass NamedTuples and str, of which we have many in our codebase
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/146276
Approved by: https://github.com/aorenste
This is the initial foreach map HOP for pointwise ops which will be extended in the future to support grouped GEMMs and other ops.
This PR utilizes PrimHOPBase class to represent foreach_map as a HOP with a single subgraph. The way this is implemented is that the user API `foreach_map` provides a single pointwise torch op, and internally this function calls a polyfill which has the same semantics as a foreach op (ie iterates over lists of operands applying the op elementwise). The higher order op is passed through the stack down to inductor where a lowering in essence inlines the subgraph into the main graph. This is done by interpreting it with a pointwise subgraph lowering, grouping the outputs by device, and registering the output buffers as foreach groups as applicable. For testing I was able to reuse the existing foreach tests by creating a wrapper function which matches the foreach op interfaces for those tests and then run all of the existing foreach tests on foreach_map.
TODO before landing:
* Add tests for general functions
* Test warning if unsupported op will block fusion
Followups:
* I need to add tests for backwards (this will be a followup PR because backwards will require other work as well)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/142098
Approved by: https://github.com/eellison
The old implementation of `SetVariable.call_method("update", ...)` was
incorrectly becacuse it wouldn't handle iterable inputs. This patches
removes the input type restriction altogether, and implements the method
as a polyfill (like how most of the other set methods are handled).
Fixes#141283.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/141286
Approved by: https://github.com/anijain2305
This PR implements tracing of with contexts with TorchFunction modes which have the default enter/exit behavior (ie pushing/popping the mode)
Typically the bytecode for a context manager looks like this during a graph break:
1. graph call
2. enter context
3. unsupported code
4. exit context
5. resume call
resume fn structure:
1. enter context
2. jump
...
3. exit context
The issue with torch function modes is that side effects will replay any mutations to the torch function stack performed during tracing. So, we do not need to enter and exit around the unsupported code in the original function (doing so would result in a duplicate torch function mode entry during execution of the unsupported code), and we don't need to enter again in the resume function (the mode that was pushed from the side effects bytecode would still be on the stack).
So for torch function modes the structure of our output code is this:
1. graph call
2. mutate tf mode stack to replay mutations
4. unsupported code
5. on exception restore stack
6. resume function
Then our resume fn looks like this:
1. no-op enter torch function mode
2. jump
3. exit tf mode
To implement the no-op enter of the torch function mode I added torch function mode in polyfill which no-op enters, but normally exits. This is needed because we still want to trace the with context in the resume function, and exit properly (the exit instructions will still be in the function, so we need to generate instructions to set up the context).
Separately from the bytecode, dynamo also tracks contexts on the block stack, which is how the SETUP_* instructions are implemented. Naturally at a graph break, we exit these block stacks to properly reset the contexts entirely, so that we can re-enter around the unsupported code soundly. However once again, in the torch function mode case, in the event of a graph we do not want to perform any exit side effects because we want to preserve the state of the mode stack as is so that we will properly update the stack with bytecode mentioned in the first section. If we exited here, dynamo would pop the mode off of the symbolic stack, and not update the true python torch function mode stack with the suffix bytecode. All in all, for torch function modes we enter exactly once, update the global torch function mode stack with side effects bytecode, re-read this stack when compiling the resume function, and exit exactly once in the resume function. This matches the semantics of eager exactly.
Approved by: https://github.com/williamwen42
ghstack dependencies: #134732, #133137, #135443, #135444
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/137114
Approved by: https://github.com/yanboliang
This PR implements tracing of with contexts with TorchFunction modes which have the default enter/exit behavior (ie pushing/popping the mode)
Typically the bytecode for a context manager looks like this during a graph break:
1. graph call
2. enter context
3. unsupported code
4. exit context
5. resume call
resume fn structure:
1. enter context
2. jump
...
3. exit context
The issue with torch function modes is that side effects will replay any mutations to the torch function stack performed during tracing. So, we do not need to enter and exit around the unsupported code in the original function (doing so would result in a duplicate torch function mode entry during execution of the unsupported code), and we don't need to enter again in the resume function (the mode that was pushed from the side effects bytecode would still be on the stack).
So for torch function modes the structure of our output code is this:
1. graph call
2. mutate tf mode stack to replay mutations
4. unsupported code
5. on exception restore stack
6. resume function
Then our resume fn looks like this:
1. no-op enter torch function mode
2. jump
3. exit tf mode
To implement the no-op enter of the torch function mode I added torch function mode in polyfill which no-op enters, but normally exits. This is needed because we still want to trace the with context in the resume function, and exit properly (the exit instructions will still be in the function, so we need to generate instructions to set up the context).
Separately from the bytecode, dynamo also tracks contexts on the block stack, which is how the SETUP_* instructions are implemented. Naturally at a graph break, we exit these block stacks to properly reset the contexts entirely, so that we can re-enter around the unsupported code soundly. However once again, in the torch function mode case, in the event of a graph we do not want to perform any exit side effects because we want to preserve the state of the mode stack as is so that we will properly update the stack with bytecode mentioned in the first section. If we exited here, dynamo would pop the mode off of the symbolic stack, and not update the true python torch function mode stack with the suffix bytecode. All in all, for torch function modes we enter exactly once, update the global torch function mode stack with side effects bytecode, re-read this stack when compiling the resume function, and exit exactly once in the resume function. This matches the semantics of eager exactly.
Approved by: https://github.com/williamwen42
ghstack dependencies: #134732, #133137, #135443, #135444
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/137114
Approved by: https://github.com/yanboliang
This reverts commit 7743149b2b.
Reverts
* https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/135503
* https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/135502
* https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/135422
This passes this test. Earlier, the getitem would stay like a getitem in the Fx graph. But now the fake tensor propagations fails saying that .item is called. It seems that torch function is not getting triggered while fake tensor propagation.
```
import torch
from torch.nn.attention.flex_attention import BlockMask, _mask_mod_signature, _score_mod_signature, flex_attention
from torch._inductor.lowering import make_pointwise, register_lowering
from torch._inductor.virtualized import ops
from torch.nn.attention.flex_attention import create_block_mask
torch.set_default_device('cuda')
flex_attention = torch.compile(flex_attention, dynamic=False)
prefix_lengths = torch.arange(8)
def prefix_lm(b, h, q, kv):
return prefix_lengths[b] >= kv
mask = create_block_mask(prefix_lm, 8, None, 512, 512, _compile=True)
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/136590
Approved by: https://github.com/Chillee
This PR implements tracing of with contexts with TorchFunction modes which have the default enter/exit behavior (ie pushing/popping the mode)
Typically the bytecode for a context manager looks like this during a graph break:
1. graph call
2. enter context
3. unsupported code
4. exit context
5. resume call
resume fn structure:
1. enter context
2. jump
...
3. exit context
The issue with torch function modes is that side effects will replay any mutations to the torch function stack performed during tracing. So, we do not need to enter and exit around the unsupported code in the original function (doing so would result in a duplicate torch function mode entry during execution of the unsupported code), and we don't need to enter again in the resume function (the mode that was pushed from the side effects bytecode would still be on the stack).
So for torch function modes the structure of our output code is this:
1. graph call
2. mutate tf mode stack to replay mutations
4. unsupported code
5. on exception restore stack
6. resume function
Then our resume fn looks like this:
1. no-op enter torch function mode
2. jump
3. exit tf mode
To implement the no-op enter of the torch function mode I added torch function mode in polyfill which no-op enters, but normally exits. This is needed because we still want to trace the with context in the resume function, and exit properly (the exit instructions will still be in the function, so we need to generate instructions to set up the context).
Separately from the bytecode, dynamo also tracks contexts on the block stack, which is how the SETUP_* instructions are implemented. Naturally at a graph break, we exit these block stacks to properly reset the contexts entirely, so that we can re-enter around the unsupported code soundly. However once again, in the torch function mode case, in the event of a graph we do not want to perform any exit side effects because we want to preserve the state of the mode stack as is so that we will properly update the stack with bytecode mentioned in the first section. If we exited here, dynamo would pop the mode off of the symbolic stack, and not update the true python torch function mode stack with the suffix bytecode. All in all, for torch function modes we enter exactly once, update the global torch function mode stack with side effects bytecode, re-read this stack when compiling the resume function, and exit exactly once in the resume function. This matches the semantics of eager exactly.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/135422
Approved by: https://github.com/williamwen42
ghstack dependencies: #134732, #133137, #135443, #135444
