Summary:
ncclUniqueID is only relevant when a comm is created using ncclCommCreate or ncclCommCreateConfig. If a comm is created with ncclCommSplit, this field is unset, causing its usage to create unexpected behavior.
This patch creates a unique hash key for each comm, irrespective of how the comm is created.
Test Plan:
CI
Reviewers:
Subscribers:
Tasks:
Tags:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/156790
Approved by: https://github.com/fduwjj, https://github.com/kwen2501
This consists mainly in two changes:
- ensure we can reliably obtain the device from a `NCCLComm` object (there was one constructor which didn't set the device)
- use a RAII pattern for acquiring the lock to the global dictionary of `NCCLComms` (which ensures the lock is released in case of exceptions)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/150681
Approved by: https://github.com/kwen2501
Summary:
LLVM has a warning `-Wunused-value` which we treat as an error because it's so often diagnostic of a code issue. Unused values often indicate a programming mistake, but can also just be unnecessary cruft that harms readability and performance.
For questions/comments, contact r-barnes.
- If you approve of this diff, please use the "Accept & Ship" button :-)
Test Plan: Sandcastle
Differential Revision: D69945678
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/147555
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007, https://github.com/eqy
So that NVLink SHARP comes with zero-copy on H100+ platforms, for DDP applications.
Less SM usage, less memory contention between NCCL kernel and compute kernels.
Added env `DDP_DISABLE_COMM_MEM` as a back-out option:
```
An environment variable to disable comm-optimized memory pool.
Default is 0, which means comm-optimized memory pool is enabled.
Users can set it to 1 in case of seeing regression or OOM (because this
comm MemPool may not share space with regular compute MemPool).
```
Differential Revision: [D69297766](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D69297766)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/146589
Approved by: https://github.com/syed-ahmed, https://github.com/c-p-i-o, https://github.com/fduwjj
Summary: D68801098 introduced this function signature mismatch issue for printNcclCommProxyTrace. Revert it so that trunk build can pass.
Test Plan:
With the change, build of APS model using rcclexp can now pass:
`sh scripts/ltian/run_jobs/fb_fm_v2/run_fb_fm_v2_job.sh -h T20_GTT_MI300X -n 16 -b 1024 -t [2024-12-06] -d ai_infra_ngs -e ai_infra_training_rnd_tc -x 0`
Reviewed By: c-p-i-o
Differential Revision: D69149588
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/146453
Approved by: https://github.com/c-p-i-o
Summary:
Dump the active proxyOp status per rank and per communicator when WatchDog timeout or aborts.
Added
`#if defined(USE_ROCM) && defined(NCCL_COMM_DUMP)` guard in the print function, so only rcclexp users will see this dump in console.
This is the changes of the PTD.
Test Plan:
Job with A2A hang due to receiver failing to post receive operations https://fburl.com/mlhub/95vg12r3
{F1971449692}
Reviewed By: c-p-i-o
Differential Revision: D67036093
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/143678
Approved by: https://github.com/c-p-i-o
In nonblocking mode, we always check if the NCCL communicator is ready between issuing commands to it.
Today this is done by the `waitReady()` function.
Unfortunately, the `waitReady()` function is burned with `C10D_NCCL_CHECK_TIMEOUT_SLEEP` which would sleep for an interval between two consecutive checks.
While this is nice when waiting for comm init or finalize, it degrades performance of collective calls (which would almost certainly return success immediately.)
This PR adds a `bool longInterval` argument to `waitReady` and let call site determine whether long wait is likely; if not, `waitReady` would use `sched_yield()` to more eagerly check for readiness.
Thanks @eqy for reporting an issue that small collectives has perf impact in nonblocking mode.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/142291
Approved by: https://github.com/eqy, https://github.com/fduwjj
Today `destroy_process_group()` is implemented via `ncclCommAbort`.
When user call it in CPU, risk is that a healthy NCCL kernel gets preempted, which causes data corruption.
Instead of aborting kernels, we should flush collectives in `destroy_process_group`, i.e. let them complete normally, before we tear down resources.
This PR implements such "flushing" behavior using `ncclCommFinalize`, then reclaims resources via `ncclCommDestroy`.
Expected behaviors:
For a bad program, a hang is expected at `destroy_process_group()`. If the PG uses non-blocking communicators, such hang is recoverable, because we attaches a timeout to the flush behavior.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/141510
Approved by: https://github.com/wconstab
### Motivation
`ncclCommInitRank` needs GPU guard (documented in NCCL).
`ncclCommAbort`, `ncclCommFinalize` and `ncclCommDestroy` may also need GPU guard (undocumented in NCCL); otherwise, extra CUDA context may be created (or worse, hang); both effects have been seen before in our tests.
### Solution
This PR records a device index during `NCCLComm` object creation, so that we can add GPU guard in `NCCLComm`'s method calling which direct to the above NCCL APIs.
### Note
This is not a bug fix. Just a safety improvement.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/141270
Approved by: https://github.com/eqy
ghstack dependencies: #141374
Summary:
Add a wait counter for the dump function.
This is useful to see if we get stuck in the dump function and never return for a particular job.
Test Plan: Tested locally I and see `pytorch.wait_counter.NCCLTraceBuffer__dump.busy_time_us.sum.60` in ODS.
Differential Revision: D65823433
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/140823
Approved by: https://github.com/fduwjj
### Motivation
Today, watchdog only reports that it found a collective timeout:
```
[rank1]:[E1104 14:02:18.767594328 ProcessGroupNCCL.cpp:688] [Rank 1] Watchdog caught collective operation timeout: WorkNCCL(SeqNum=1, OpType=ALLREDUCE, NumelIn=200, NumelOut=200, Timeout(ms)=5000) ran for 5096 milliseconds before timing out.
```
While this is nice, it is hard to associate the error with user's program or library stack.
### This PR
This PR gives watchdog the ability to report the call-time stack of the collective, so that it would be easier to track the error back to the program's behavior.
The call-time stack was recorded by Flight Recorder with minimal overhead (for details, please read this [doc](https://dev-discuss.pytorch.org/t/fast-combined-c-python-torchscript-inductor-tracebacks/1158) written by @zdevito ). In `ProcessGroupNCCL`, we are only tracking / reporting the python part so that it fits most PyTorch users.
### Demo
[stack_demo.py](https://gist.github.com/kwen2501/6758e18d305d67fc6f3f926217825c09).
```
TORCH_NCCL_TRACE_BUFFER_SIZE=100 torchrun --nproc-per-node 2 stack_demo.py
```
`TORCH_NCCL_TRACE_BUFFER_SIZE` is for turning on the Flight Recorder.
Output:
```
[rank0]:[E1104 14:19:27.591610653 ProcessGroupNCCL.cpp:695] Stack trace of the timedout collective operation:
#0 all_reduce from /data/users/kw2501/pytorch/torch/distributed/distributed_c10d.py:2696
#1 wrapper from /data/users/kw2501/pytorch/torch/distributed/c10d_logger.py:83
#2 bar from /data/users/kw2501/sync_async/repro.py:15
#3 foo from /data/users/kw2501/sync_async/repro.py:24
#4 main from /data/users/kw2501/sync_async/repro.py:34
#5 <module> from /data/users/kw2501/sync_async/repro.py:40
[rank1]:[E1104 14:19:27.771430164 ProcessGroupNCCL.cpp:695] Stack trace of the timedout collective operation:
#0 all_gather_into_tensor from /data/users/kw2501/pytorch/torch/distributed/distributed_c10d.py:3630
#1 wrapper from /data/users/kw2501/pytorch/torch/distributed/c10d_logger.py:83
#2 baz from /data/users/kw2501/sync_async/repro.py:20
#3 foo from /data/users/kw2501/sync_async/repro.py:26
#4 main from /data/users/kw2501/sync_async/repro.py:34
#5 <module> from /data/users/kw2501/sync_async/repro.py:40
```
From the log above, we can tell that `bar()` and `baz()` are the places where the two ranks divert.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/139659
Approved by: https://github.com/wconstab, https://github.com/fduwjj
### Why use non-blocking mode in eager init?
For overlapping comm init and model init, etc.
### Why can we set non-blocking as default?
If the setting is dangling -- i.e. not passed in by user nor set via env -- `ProcessGroupNCCL` can have some preferred logic. And torch-level API semantics does not change whether the NCCL comm is blocking or non-blocking (handled within `ProcessGroupNCCL`).
### Why not make non-blocking default for lazy mode as well?
PR https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/137544 tried it.
Two reasons why that's not preferred today:
1. It is hard -- too big a blast.
2. There is no gain by doing lazy init in non-blocking mode, because the right next CPU call is a collective, and we will block there waiting for comm to be ready, so same effect as blocked init, no "opening" compared to eager mode.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/138527
Approved by: https://github.com/wconstab
ghstack dependencies: #138860
### Why use non-blocking mode in eager init?
For overlapping comm init and model init, etc.
### Why can we set non-blocking as default?
If the setting is dangling -- i.e. not passed in by user nor set via env -- `ProcessGroupNCCL` can have some preferred logic. And torch-level API semantics does not change whether the NCCL comm is blocking or non-blocking (handled within `ProcessGroupNCCL`).
### Why not make non-blocking default for lazy mode as well?
PR https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/137544 tried it.
Two reasons why that's not preferred today:
1. It is hard -- too big a blast.
2. There is no gain by doing lazy init in non-blocking mode, because the right next CPU call is a collective, and we will block there waiting for comm to be ready, so same effect as blocked init, no "opening" compared to eager mode.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/138527
Approved by: https://github.com/wconstab
ghstack dependencies: #138860
### Why use non-blocking mode in eager init?
For overlapping comm init and model init, etc.
### Why can we set non-blocking as default?
If the setting is dangling -- i.e. not passed in by user nor set via env -- `ProcessGroupNCCL` can have some preferred logic. And torch-level API semantics does not change whether the NCCL comm is blocking or non-blocking (handled within `ProcessGroupNCCL`).
### Why not make non-blocking default for lazy mode as well?
PR https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/137544 tried it.
Two reasons why that's not preferred today:
1. It is hard -- too big a blast.
2. There is no gain by doing lazy init in non-blocking mode, because the right next CPU call is a collective, and we will block there waiting for comm to be ready, so same effect as blocked init, no "opening" compared to eager mode.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/138527
Approved by: https://github.com/wconstab
ghstack dependencies: #137855, #138488, #138374, #138384
Previously we only wait for comm to become ready after its initialization.
That's not enough. There are other NCCL APIs that can cause the comm to be InProgress, e.g. P2P calls, commSplit, commFinalize, etc.
Therefore, we just ensure comm is ready every "next time" we need to access ncclComm.
The place to add such gate keeper is `getNcclComm`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/138384
Approved by: https://github.com/shuqiangzhang, https://github.com/fduwjj
ghstack dependencies: #137855, #138488, #138374
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/137856.
### Issue 1
Today under `ProcessGroupNCCL::Options`, color is declared as:
```
int64_t split_color{0};
```
When passing this variable to `ncclCommSplit` which accepts `int`, the value may overflow and become negative, as in #137856. But NCCL API only accepts non-negative colors (or `NCCL_SPLIT_NOCOLOR`).
But that's not all.
### Issue 2
`split_color` is pybind'ed to python frontend. If we just change from `int64_t` to `int` in C++, pybind will complain:
```
[rank0]: TypeError: (): incompatible function arguments. The following argument types are supported:
[rank0]: 1. (self: torch._C._distributed_c10d.ProcessGroupNCCL.Options, arg0: int) -> None
```
This is because python `int` represents a wider range than C++ `int`. So we cannot pass hash values -- which are potentially big ints -- from python to C++. The PR modulo the hash value with `c_int`'s max value.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/137855
Approved by: https://github.com/wconstab
### Fix 1: Throw async error during init wait
Previously we just busy wait for `ncclSuccess`, if the nonblocking init encountered error, we never report that. Added detection of async error via `ncclGetAsyncError`.
### Fix 2: Add wait after comm split
```
// After calling ncclCommSplit in non-blocking mode, we should wait for the
// source communicator to be out of ncclInProgress state.
// Reason 1:
// it's unsafe to call new operations on the parent comm while it's in
// ncclInProgress state.
// Reason 2:
// as of NCCL 2.23, the ptr value of child comm will not be filled until the
// state of parent comm is ncclSuccess. This may change in the future. See:
// https://github.com/NVIDIA/nccl/issues/1472
```
This wait does not mean the child comm is ready for use, neither does it block till that point.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/137741
Approved by: https://github.com/shuqiangzhang
When non-blocking mode is enabled, we need to make sure `ncclComm_` is ready before calling NCCL APIs on it.
`NCCLComm::getNcclComm` help us do that (thanks to a wait function inside), thus is preferred than directly using `ncclComm_`.
To prevent `ncclComm_` from being directly used outside, e.g. in `ProcessGroupNCCL`, we also move it as a private member of `NCCLComm` class -- the external-facing wrapper.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/137573
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007, https://github.com/shuqiangzhang, https://github.com/c-p-i-o
ghstack dependencies: #137572
- This PR generates a more useful output log for users: P1552399180.
- It also fixes the logic when we check the all-gather size mismatch.
- Add dtype check for collective input/output
- We store more context information for error match_state so that we can report them in the file.
- Disable the size match for alltoall because we don't log the size for all inputs/outputs.
- Correct some types for func args specification.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134528
Approved by: https://github.com/c-p-i-o
This adds logs if we can't acquire locks in NCCLUtils and ProcessGroupNCCL for 30s.
This is motivated by some deadlocks were seeing and it's unclear if it's in NCCL or on the PyTorch side of things.
This required replacing most `std::mutex` with `std::timed_mutex` and `std::condition_variable_any` as appropriate.
Test plan:
existing CI for regressions
will add unit tests on `C10D_LOCK_GUARD`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134131
Approved by: https://github.com/c-p-i-o, https://github.com/fduwjj
