Summary:
Partially fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/66066
This PR:
- cleans up op-specific testing from test_autograd. test_autograd should be reserved for testing generic autograd functionality
- tests related to an operator are better colocated
- see the tracker for details
What to think about when moving tests to their correct test suite:
- naming, make sure its not too generic
- how the test is parametrized, sometimes we need to add/remove a device/dtype parameter
- can this be merged with existing tests
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/67413
Reviewed By: jbschlosser, albanD
Differential Revision: D32031480
Pulled By: soulitzer
fbshipit-source-id: 8e13da1e58a38d5cecbfdfd4fe2b4fe6f816897f
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/66245Fixes#66053
This PR splits `declare_static_dtype_and_device` into two new methods for
`TensorIteratorBase`: `declare_static_dtype` and `declare_static_device`.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: ejguan
Differential Revision: D31503849
Pulled By: ngimel
fbshipit-source-id: 4b131b691d29ceb5f3709f5d6503997ea0875c54
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/64267
This test expects every operation to throw a runtime error.
And Reinsert in-place operation test，Fix bug for comparison operation
fix: #64018
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: gchanan
Differential Revision: D30720915
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 215a6556d20770f70f4ced1c1f9a9753933f1d37
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/63554
Following https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/61840#issuecomment-884087809, this deprecates all the dtype getters publicly exposed in the `torch.testing` namespace. The reason for this twofold:
1. If someone is not familiar with the C++ dispatch macros PyTorch uses, the names are misleading. For example `torch.testing.floating_types()` will only give you `float32` and `float64` skipping `float16` and `bfloat16`.
2. The dtype getters provide very minimal functionality that can be easily emulated by downstream libraries.
We thought about [providing an replacement](https://gist.github.com/pmeier/3dfd2e105842ad0de4505068a1a0270a), but ultimately decided against it. The major problem is BC: by keeping it, either the namespace is getting messy again after a new dtype is added or we need to somehow version the return values of the getters.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: H-Huang
Differential Revision: D30662206
Pulled By: mruberry
fbshipit-source-id: a2bdb10ab02ae665df1b5b76e8afa9af043bbf56
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/60548
`Tensor.__floordiv__` was indirectly deprecated by deprecation of `torch.floor_divide` (see https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/43874). Deprecating it directly provides clearer feedback.
Repro:
```
import torch
x = torch.tensor(0)
x // 1
```
Before this change, a deprecation warning was triggered within the C++ implementation of floor_divide:
```
UserWarning: floor_divide is deprecated, and will be removed in a future version of pytorch. It currently rounds toward 0 (like the 'trunc' function NOT 'floor'). This results in incorrect rounding for negative values.
To keep the current behavior, use torch.div(a, b, rounding_mode='trunc'), or for actual floor division, use torch.div(a, b, rounding_mode='floor'). (Triggered internally at ../aten/src/ATen/native/BinaryOps.cpp:571.)
return torch.floor_divide(self, other)
```
After this change, the warning instead cites the user's offending line of Python code:
```
UserWarning: __floordiv__ is deprecated, and its behavior will change in a future version of pytorch. It currently rounds toward 0 (like the 'trunc' function NOT 'floor'). This results in incorrect rounding for negative values.
To keep the current behavior, use torch.div(a, b, rounding_mode='trunc'), or for actual floor division, use torch.div(a, b, rounding_mode='floor').
x // 1
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/64034
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D30658010
Pulled By: saketh-are
fbshipit-source-id: b0e6c5008d741897509d102f4a89efb47de4aa2a
Summary:
As proof of concept, this PR uses the new `BinaryUfuncOpInfo` in broadcasting tests for `add`, `sub`, `mul`, `div`, `floor_div`, and `true_div`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/61964
Reviewed By: ngimel
Differential Revision: D30407734
Pulled By: mruberry
fbshipit-source-id: ada28994f43b0635f279f45a02ecba18bc8ee033
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/61349
Also add type promotion test for bugs found by pr #60813
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D29592840
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: ee013b20e31baf6c6ebf2edb881ae6d8e215c7a6
Summary:
This PR un-reverts https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/61475 + fixes compilation with MSVC, that does not recognize alternative operator spellings (i.e. using `or` instead of `||` )
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/61937
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D29805941
Pulled By: malfet
fbshipit-source-id: 01e5963c6717c1b44b260300d87ba0bf57f26ce9
Summary:
The `ops` decorator provides a way to parameterize a test across a given list of ops. This would be useful for modules as well (e.g. a `modules` decorator), but the mechanism by which this is accomplished is specific to ops. In the details, the `ops` decorator tags a test function with the metadata needed (list of ops, `dtypes`) and the actual tests are generated according to this metadata during the call to `instantiate_device_type_tests()`.
This PR makes this mechanism more generic, allowing for test parameterization across arbitrary dimensions. This makes a `modules` decorator (or any similar type of decorator) straightforward to implement without changes to the device-specific test instantiation logic.
One caveat is that, since this is implemented where the old `ops` decorator was (within `instantiate_device_type_tests()`), this only works for tests instantiated using the device-specific instantiation logic. Longer term, even device-specific test instantiation could be treated as an optional parameterization across device types, but this PR takes a low-risk approach for now. In practice, this just means that a `device` kwarg is required for all test signatures used with the mechanism.
The `ops` decorator has been refactored to use the generic mechanism and works the same as before, with one difference: when `OpDTypes.none` is specified, the test signature no longer needs an unused `dtype` kwarg. This is a nice bonus that demonstrates the added flexibility of a generic parameterization mechanism. The refactored form also has the bonus that all op-specific test generation logic is contained within the `ops` decorator class, improving readability.
Behind the scenes, the generic mechanism is a base decorator class (`_TestParameterizer`) from which `ops` derives. The core functionality is in the `_parameterize_test()` method, which takes in a test function and returns a generator that produces parameterized tests, including names and parameter kwargs to pass to them. Using the `ops` decorator results in a set of op-specific tests from a given generic test.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/60233
Reviewed By: iramazanli
Differential Revision: D29494995
Pulled By: jbschlosser
fbshipit-source-id: a14446488c106094fafcaa75ccf8e9e3faf33bfc
Summary:
Reference https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/50345
`zeta` was already present in the codebase to support computation of `polygamma`.
However, `zeta` only had `double(double, double)` signature **for CPU** before the PR (which meant that computation `polygamma` were always upcasted to `double` for zeta part).
With this PR, float computations will take place in float and double in double.
Have also refactored the code and moved the duplicate code from `Math.cuh` to `Math.h`
**Note**: For scipy, q is optional, and if it is `None`, it defaults `1` which corresponds to Reimann-Zeta. However, for `torch.specia.zeta`, I made it mandatory cause for me it feels odd without `q` this is Reimann-Zeta and with `q` it is the general Hurwitz Zeta. I think sticking to just general made more sense as passing `1` for q sounds trivial.
Verify:
* [x] Docs https://14234587-65600975-gh.circle-artifacts.com/0/docs/special.html#torch.special.zeta
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/59623
Reviewed By: ngimel
Differential Revision: D29348269
Pulled By: mruberry
fbshipit-source-id: a3f9ebe1f7724dbe66de2b391afb9da1cfc3e4bb
Summary:
This PR lets `torch.add` & `torch.sub` CUDA kernels cast `alpha` to `acc_type`, not `scalar_t`.
I do not remove `cast`s from `test/test_foreach.py` because I'll do this in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/59907 or follow-up for it.
Current upstream `torch._foreach_add` & `torch._foreach_sub` upcast `alpha` parameter to `acc_type<scalar_t>` while `torch.add` & `torch.sub` not. This is kind of problematic because outputs of `torch.add` and `torch.sub` are different from `torch._foreach_add` and `torch._foreach_sub`, respectively if the dtype of input tensors is either `torch.half` or `torch.bfloat16`. The discrepancy is proportional-ish to `abs(alpha)` except when `alpha` is representable with 16 bits.
ref:
- `torch._foreach_add` & `torch._foreach_sub` cast `alpha`: 6d0fb85a62/aten/src/ATen/native/cuda/ForeachBinaryOpList.cu (L21-L28), `BinaryOpListAlphaFunctor` is defined here: 6d0fb85a62/aten/src/ATen/native/cuda/ForeachFunctors.cuh (L202)
related: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/58833, https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/59907
cc ngimel ptrblck mcarilli
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/60227
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D29252759
Pulled By: ngimel
fbshipit-source-id: 847f3b9493ae30a900f7445af00aef1abcc1ab21
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/57719.
This PR fixes `torch.Tensor{__rsub__, __rdiv__, __rtruediv__, __pow__, __rmatmul__}` to return `NotImplemented` instead of raising a `TypeError`.
cc/ mruberry: The first commit of this PR is the same as 1d209db1cc excepts the commit message.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/57934
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D28351931
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: 985457a44dba24d2496794dfb8c1661cbcd4ff8f
Summary:
Currently, the test code is not testing unknown types correctly because `op` is overwritten in the for-loop (i.e., currently only `__ior__` is tested).
This PR fixes the test `generate_not_implemented_tests` to bind operator name to each method, and remove operators currently unsupported (`__rand__`, …).
cc/ mruberry This fix is be needed to add tests for the operator we are going to introduce (e.g., `__rand__`)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/56997
Reviewed By: astaff
Differential Revision: D28118465
Pulled By: mruberry
fbshipit-source-id: c5a466a7604262ed5490862300d47043aff63d0b
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/54085
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/50121.
This fixes two similar issues pointed out with the dtype that `torch.pow` performs its computation. Thanks ngimel for spotting the issues originally (comments [here](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/53669#discussion_r594624355) and [here](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/53669#discussion_r594719704))!
Before:
```
>>> torch.pow(2, torch.tensor([17], dtype=torch.uint8), out=torch.tensor([0]))
tensor([0])
>>> torch.pow(2, torch.tensor(17, dtype=torch.uint8), out=torch.tensor(0))
tensor(131072)
>>> torch.pow(2, torch.tensor([17], dtype=torch.uint8, device='cuda'), out=torch.tensor([0], device='cuda'))
tensor([131072], device='cuda:0')
>>> torch.pow(2, torch.tensor(17, dtype=torch.uint8, device='cuda'), out=torch.tensor(0, device='cuda'))
tensor(131072, device='cuda:0')
```
After:
```
>>> torch.pow(2, torch.tensor([17], dtype=torch.uint8), out=torch.tensor([0]))
tensor([0])
>>> torch.pow(2, torch.tensor(17, dtype=torch.uint8), out=torch.tensor(0))
tensor(0)
>>> torch.pow(2, torch.tensor([17], dtype=torch.uint8, device='cuda'), out=torch.tensor([0], device='cuda'))
tensor([0], device='cuda:0')
>>> torch.pow(2, torch.tensor(17, dtype=torch.uint8, device='cuda'), out=torch.tensor(0, device='cuda'))
tensor(0, device='cuda:0')
```
In all four cases above, `tensor(0, ...)` is the correct value because the computed "common dtype" among the inputs is expected to be `uint8`. Computing `2 ** 7` in uint8 will then overflow to zero. Finally, we cast the computed output to the output tensor's dtype, which is `int32`.
There were two separate issues fixed in this PR: one for cpu and one for cuda:
* For CPU, The `pow(Scalar, Tensor)` overload wasn't calling `set_wrapped_number(true)` after wrapping the scalar in a Tensor, which caused the "promoted" scalar to incorrectly participate in type promotion (see the documented behavior [here](aa8714dfed/c10/core/TensorImpl.h (L590)))
* For CUDA, the cuda kernels defined in `PowKernel.cu` were using the output's dtype to run the computation, instead of the common dtype.
As an aside: The CPU and CUDA kernels actually both use `iter.dtype()` instead of `iter.common_dtype()` to run the computation, which I fixed. The reason that only manifested here for CUDA is because TensorIterator has cpu-specific logic to create temporary outputs with the intermediate dtype (shown [here](aa8714dfed/aten/src/ATen/TensorIterator.cpp (L349))). I'm not sure what the end state is there- I can imagine that being something we're more okay doing for cpu than for cuda, but it also leads to hard-to-track-down inconsistencies between the two like in this case.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: ngimel
Differential Revision: D27096330
Pulled By: bdhirsh
fbshipit-source-id: a7e2909243851625cb3056d1e7abb2383bfe95f2
Summary:
#### Reason for relanding
Line 1607 of `torch/testing/_internal/common_methods_invocations.py` of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/50999 had `dtype` instead of `dtype=torch.bool`, so 4 of the 9 sample inputs for `bool` had incorrect dtype. This bug was caught by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/54949.
1. Added support for pow() on CPU for `float16` (`Half`) and `bfloat16` types.
Both `pow(Tensor, Scalar)` and `pow(Tensor, Tensor)` are now supported for the aforementioned types.
However autograd isn't supported for `Float16` on CPU yet, as `log_vml_cpu` can't be enabled for it.
2. heitorschueroff added `pow_tensor_scalar_optimized_kernel` to refactor & simplify `PowKernel.cpp`.
It provides a common path for all the complex types & floating point types (except Float16, due to lack of complete AVX2 vectorization support for it). It replaced code that had previously been duplicated for (float, double) and complex types,
so PowKernel.cpp looks a lot cleaner now.
3. Enabled (unskipped) some tests for `erf`, `erfc`,`erfinv`, `tan` and `linalg.vector.norm` which were being skipped earlier due to `pow()` not having been implemented for `float16` & `bfloat16`.
4. Added an OpInfo for `pow()` & enabled some test cases for `pow()`.
5. Extended the coverage of existing tests for `pow` in `test_binary_ufuncs.py` in order to enable comparison with `numpy`, even with discontiguous tensors, and added a test to ensure that a runtime error is raised for `pow`'s inplace variant if resizing the base tensor is required during its invocation.
6. Added `float16` & `bfloat16` to `square`'s dtype lists in its `UnaryUfuncInfo`.
7. Removed redundant `dtypesIfCPU` and `dtypesIfCUDA` from `OpInfo`s where they are equal to `dtypes`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/55280
Reviewed By: jbschlosser
Differential Revision: D27591772
Pulled By: heitorschueroff
fbshipit-source-id: c7420811b32595bb3353149a61e54a73f2eb352b
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/54964
Previously, the following would error out with a strange error message:
```
import torch
x=torch.randn(2)
torch.rsub(x, 1, alpha=2j)
Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-2-caf2a1c03d0b> in <module>
1 import torch
2 x=torch.randn(2)
----> 3 torch.rsub(x, 1, alpha=2j)
RuntimeError: value cannot be converted to type float without overflow: (-0,-2)
```
The reason why this is happening is because the alpha check doesn't check for if `x` is not complex and `alpha` is complex.
The error gets thrown further along in the implementation of torch.sub,
when it coerces `alpha` to be the same dtype as the input tensor:
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/master/aten/src/ATen/native/cpu/BinaryOpsKernel.cpp#L53
This PR fixes the bad error message by adding a new check to the alpha check.
Test Plan:
- pytest test/test_binary_ufuncs.py
- NB: add, sub, and rsub all share the same alpha check. The test only tests it for torch.add, but that should be sufficient.
Reviewed By: gchanan
Differential Revision: D27504017
Pulled By: zou3519
fbshipit-source-id: 70b9aa75a7a4faaaa93f6ba235cae85998a91697
Summary:
Added the functionality desired in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/50789.
1. Added support for pow() on CPU for `float16` (`Half`) and `bfloat16` types.
Both `pow(Tensor, Scalar)` and `pow(Tensor, Tensor)` are now supported for the aforementioned types.
However autograd isn't supported for `Float16` on CPU yet, as `log_vml_cpu` can't be enabled for it.
2. heitorschueroff added `pow_tensor_scalar_optimized_kernel` to refactor & simplify `PowKernel.cpp`.
It provides a common path for all the complex types & floating point types (except Float16, due to lack of complete AVX2 vectorization support for it). It replaced code that had previously been duplicated for (float, double) and complex types,
so PowKernel.cpp looks a lot cleaner now.
3. Enabled (unskipped) some tests for `erf`, `erfc`,`erfinv`, `linalg.norm` and `linalg.vector.norm` which were being skipped earlier due to `pow()` not having been implemented for `float16` & `bfloat16`.
4. Added an OpInfo for `pow()` & enabled some test cases for `pow()`.
5. Extended the coverage of existing tests for `pow` in `test_binary_ufuncs.py` in order to enable comparison with `numpy`, even with discontiguous tensors, and added a test to ensure that a runtime error is raised for `pow`'s inplace variant if resizing the base tensor is required during its invocation.
6. Added `float16` & `bfloat16` to `square`'s dtype lists in its `UnaryUfuncInfo`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/50999
Reviewed By: zou3519
Differential Revision: D27478225
Pulled By: heitorschueroff
fbshipit-source-id: d309dd98d5a96d0cb9b08281757bb1c65266d011
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/53669
This PR does two things:
* Ports `pow` to be structured
* Fixes a bug with how pow handles mixed cpu and cuda tensors
**bug fix**
Pow is a binary op, and all binary ops that use TensorIterator are currently written to handle the case when one of the inputs is a CUDA tensor, and the other is a zero-dimensional cpu tensor.
`pow` incidentally only handles one of the two cases: it fails when the CUDA tensor is passed as the exponent, e.g. `at::pow(torch.tensor(2.0, device='cpu'), torch.tensor([2, 2], device='cuda'))`. Porting `pow` to structured happened to change the error that was outputted from a `TORCH_CHECK` in TensorIterator to an `INTERNAL_ASSERT` in loop.cuh, so I ended up trying to fix the error and update the tests. I added more details in a comment on the PR.
**notes on the structured port**
Pow is a little weird, so I wrote down a couple of issues I noticed during the port:
* Multiple independent overloads. `pow` has two overloads that have their own cpu/cuda kernels, meaning one doesn't call the other. I have to update the names of the kernel overloads to make the compiler happy, since the codegen would otherwise try to generate two classes with the same name. `pow` actually has 3 overloads that all have `out` variants, so I ported all 3 to structured- one of them just happens to redispatch one of the others in most cases.
* Name propagation. Is name propagation implemented per operator? Or is expected to work for most/all ops by default. Right now it looks like it happens for TensorIterator ops by default. For ops that don't use TensorIterator, we need to explicitly pass the names through to the `set_output()` call in the meta function. This happened to matter for `pow` because it has 3 overloads, but only two of them directly use TensorIterator. I had to pass names directly to `set_output` in the 3rd overload to make tests happy.
* Lack of `const Tensor &` in the C++ API. It's a goal to slowly make all `Tensor &` arguments const as part of the structured port, but in this case I needed to explicitly cast constness away because one structured kernel called back into the C++ API, which still has ordinary `Tensor &` arguments. This probably isn't something we'll fix soon, since we have boxing logic that actually relies on the `Tensor &` / `const Tensor &` distinction in some places.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: ezyang
Differential Revision: D27029821
Pulled By: bdhirsh
fbshipit-source-id: c1786e770de6e6c2474b9a48210b88057ab1018e
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/51706
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/50280
As mentioned in gh-43874, this adds a `rounding_mode={'true', 'trunc', 'floor'}`
argument so `torch.div` can be used as a replacement for `floor_divide` during
the transitional period.
I've included dedicated kernels for truncated and floor division which
aren't strictly necessary for float, but do perform significantly better (~2x) than
doing true division followed by a separate rounding kernel.
Note: I introduce new overloads for `aten::div` instead of just adding a default
`rounding_mode` because various JIT passes rely on the exact operator schema.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: ngimel
Differential Revision: D26123271
Pulled By: mruberry
fbshipit-source-id: 51a83717602114597ec9c4d946e35a392eb01d46
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/48668
Combine tests for `fmod` and `remainder`.
## BC-breaking Note:
In order to make `remainder` operator have type promotion, we have to introduce BC breaking.
### 1.7.1:
In the case where the second argument is a python number, the result is casted to the dtype of the first argument.
```python
>>> torch.remainder(x, 1.2)
tensor([0, 0, 0, 0, 0], dtype=torch.int32)
```
### This PR:
In the case where the second argument is a python number, the dtype of result is determined by type promotion of both inputs.
```python
>>> torch.remainder(x, 1.2)
tensor([1.0000, 0.8000, 0.6000, 0.4000, 0.2000])
```
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D25869136
Pulled By: ejguan
fbshipit-source-id: 8e5e87eec605a15060f715952de140f25644008c
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/48278
Remove various lines from tests due to no type promotion introduced from #47323
## BC-breaking Note:
In order to make `fmod` operator have type promotion, we have to introduce BC breaking.
### 1.7.1:
In the case where the second argument is a python number, the result is casted to the dtype of the first argument.
```python
>>> torch.fmod(x, 1.2)
tensor([0, 0, 0, 0, 0], dtype=torch.int32)
```
### Prior PR:
Check the BC-breaking note of #47323
### This PR:
In the case where the second argument is a python number, the dtype of result is determined by type promotion of both inputs.
```python
>>> torch.fmod(x, 1.2)
tensor([1.0000, 0.8000, 0.6000, 0.4000, 0.2000])
```
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D25869137
Pulled By: ejguan
fbshipit-source-id: bce763926731e095b75daf2e934bff7c03ff0832
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/50105
There should be no functional change here.
A couple of reasons here:
1) This function is generally an anti-pattern (https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/49758) and it is good to minimize its usage in the code base.
2) pow itself has a fair amount of smarts like not broadcasting scalar/tensor combinations and we should defer to it.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D25786172
Pulled By: gchanan
fbshipit-source-id: 89de03aa0b900ce011a62911224a5441f15e331a
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/49926
While investigating https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/49758, I changed the xlogy kernel to use the recommended wrapped_scaler_tensor pattern instead of moving the scalar to the GPU as a tensor.
While this doesn't avoid a synchronization (there is no synchronization in the move, as its done via fill), this does significantly speed up the GPU kernel (almost ~50%, benchmark in PR comments).
From looking at the nvprof output, it looks like this code path avoids broadcasting. Aside: this seems unnecessary, as there is nothing special from the point-of-view of broadcasting whether the Tensor
is ()-sized or marked as a wrapped_scalar. Still, this is a useful change to make as we avoid extra kernel launches and dispatches to create and fill the tensor.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D25724215
Pulled By: gchanan
fbshipit-source-id: 4adcd5d8b3297502672ffeafc77e8af80592f460
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/49214
**BC-Breaking**
Before this PR, `%=` didn't actually do the operation inplace and returned a new tensor.
After this PR, `%=` operation is actually inplace and the modified input tensor is returned.
Before PR,
```python
>>> import torch
>>> a = torch.tensor([11,12,13])
>>> id(a)
139627966219328
>>> a %= 10
>>> id(a)
139627966219264
```
After PR,
```python
>>> import torch
>>> a = torch.tensor([11,12,13])
>>> id(a)
139804702425280
>>> a %= 10
>>> id(a)
139804702425280
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/49390
Reviewed By: izdeby
Differential Revision: D25560423
Pulled By: zou3519
fbshipit-source-id: 2b92bfda260582aa4ac22c4025376295e51f854e
Summary:
Test should verify, that all listed conditions throw, not just the first one
Refactor duplicated constants
Use `self.assertTrue()` instead of suppressing flake8 `B015: Pointless Comparison` warning
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/48597
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D25222734
Pulled By: malfet
fbshipit-source-id: 7854f755a84f23a1a52dc74402582e34d69ff984
Summary:
Creates multiple new test suites to have fewer tests in test_torch.py, consistent with previous test suite creation like test_unary_ufuncs.py and test_linalg.py.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/47356
Reviewed By: ngimel
Differential Revision: D25202268
Pulled By: mruberry
fbshipit-source-id: 75fde3ca76545d1b32b86d432a5cb7a5ba8f5bb6
