This reverts commit 06f5295 as per issues with this approach, both in
terms of efficiency impact and stability. First, contrary to the
single-item cache for transaction IDs in transam.c, the cache may finish
by not be hit for a long time, and without an invalidation mechanism to
clear it, it would cause inconsistent results on wraparound for
example. Second, the use of SubTransGetTopmostTransaction() for the
caching has a limited impact on performance. SubTransGetParent() could
have more impact, though the benchmarking of the single-item approach
still needs to be proved, particularly under the conditions where SLRU
lookups are stressed in parallel with overflowed snapshots (aka more
than 64 subxids generated, for example).
After discussion with Andres Freund.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220524235250.gtt3uu5zktfkr4hv@alap3.anarazel.de
b4529005fd