node/test/parallel/test-eslint-no-let-in-for-declaration.js
Myles Borins 474d7763d9
test: add common.skipIfEslintMissing
We've added a number of tests that hook into ESLint which can error
when running the test suite with the distributed tarball. This PR
adds a new test helper `common.skipIfEslintMissing` and will skip
remaining tests in a file when `ESLint` is not available at
`tools/node_modules/eslint`

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18807
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
2018-02-26 12:19:57 -05:00

44 lines
1.0 KiB
JavaScript

'use strict';
const common = require('../common');
common.skipIfEslintMissing();
const RuleTester = require('../../tools/eslint').RuleTester;
const rule = require('../../tools/eslint-rules/no-let-in-for-declaration');
const ruleTester = new RuleTester({ parserOptions: { ecmaVersion: 6 } });
const message = 'Use of `let` as the loop variable in a for-loop is ' +
'not recommended. Please use `var` instead.';
ruleTester.run('no-let-in-for-declaration', rule, {
valid: [
'let foo;',
'for (var foo = 1;;);',
'for (foo = 1;;);',
'for (;;);',
'for (const foo of bar);',
'for (var foo of bar);',
'for (const foo in bar);',
'for (var foo in bar);'
],
invalid: [
{
code: 'for (let foo = 1;;);',
output: 'for (var foo = 1;;);',
errors: [{ message }]
},
{
code: 'for (let foo in bar);',
output: 'for (var foo in bar);',
errors: [{ message }]
},
{
code: 'for (let foo of bar);',
output: 'for (var foo of bar);',
errors: [{ message }]
}
]
});