Userland code can break if it depends on a mutable `code` property for
errors. Allow users to change the `code` property but do not propagate
changes to the error `name`.
Additionally, make `message` and `name` consistent with `Error` object
(non-enumerable). Test that `console.log()` and `.toString()` calls on
internal `Error` objects with mutated properties have analogous results
with the standard ECMAScript `Error` objects.
Backport-PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/16078
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/15694
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/15658
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Use block-scoping rather than `err1`, `err2`, etc.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/15721
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
* Remove needless RegExp flag
In fixed case, `/g` flag is needless in the boolean context.
* Remove needless RegExp capturing
Use non-capturing grouping or remove capturing completely when:
* capturing is useless per se, e.g. in test() check;
* captured groups are not used afterward at all;
* some of the later captured groups are not used afterward.
* Use test, not match/exec in boolean context
match() and exec() return a complicated object,
unneeded in a boolean context.
* Do not needlessly repeat RegExp creation
This commit takes RegExp creation out of cycles and other repetitions.
As long as the RegExp does not use /g flag and match indices,
we are safe here.
In tests, this fix hardly gives a significant performance gain,
but it increases clarity and maintainability,
reassuring some RegExps to be identical.
RegExp in functions are not taken out of their functions:
while these functions are called many times
and their RegExps are recreated with each call,
the performance gain in test cases
does not seem to be worth decreasing function self-dependency.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13770
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Using `assert.AssertionError()` without the `new` keyword results
in a non-intuitive error:
```js
> assert.AssertionError({})
TypeError: Cannot assign to read only property 'name' of function 'function ok(value, message) {
if (!value) fail(value, true, message, '==', assert.ok);
}'
at Function.AssertionError (assert.js:45:13)
at repl:1:8
at realRunInThisContextScript (vm.js:22:35)
at sigintHandlersWrap (vm.js:98:12)
at ContextifyScript.Script.runInThisContext (vm.js:24:12)
at REPLServer.defaultEval (repl.js:346:29)
at bound (domain.js:280:14)
at REPLServer.runBound [as eval] (domain.js:293:12)
at REPLServer.onLine (repl.js:545:10)
at emitOne (events.js:101:20)
>
```
The `assert.AssertionError()` can only be used correctly with `new`,
so this converts it into a proper ES6 class that will give an
appropriate error message.
This also associates the appropriate internal/errors code with all
`assert.AssertionError` instances and updates the appropriate test
cases.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12651
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
* Assign codes to the handful of errors reported by
internal/process/*.js
* Include documentation for the new error codes
* Improve error messages
* Improve test coverage for process.nextTick
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11294
Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/11273
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Add duplicate symbol checking in E() to avoid potential confusing
result. Increase coverage of internal/errors.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11829
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <franziska.hinkelmann@gmail.com>
One downside to `common.expectsError()` is that it increases the
abstractions people have to learn about in order to work with even
simple tests. Whereas before, all they had to know about is
`assert.throws()`, now they have to *also* know about
`common.expectsError()`. This is very different (IMO) from
`common.mustCall()` in that the latter has an intuitively understandable
name, accepts arguments as one would expect, and (in most cases) doesn't
actually require reading documentation or code to figure out what it's
doing. With `common.expectsError()`, there's a fair bit of magic. Like,
it's not obvious what the first argument would be. Or the second. Or the
third. You just have to know.
This PR changes the arguments accepted by `common.expectsError()` to a
single settings object. Someone coming across this has a hope of
understanding what's going on without reading source or docs:
```js
const validatorFunction = common.expectsError({code: 'ELOOP',
type: Error,
message: 'foo'});
```
This, by comparison, is harder to grok:
```js
const validatorFunction = common.expectsError('ELOOP',
Error,
'foo');
```
And this is especially wat-inducing:
```js
common.expectsError(undefined, undefined, 'looped doodad found');
```
It's likely that only people who work with tests frequently can be
expected to remember the three arguments and their order. By comparison,
remembering that the error code is `code` and the message is `message`
might be manageable.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11512
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
* Report values in assertions.
* Strict equality match if message is a string.
* instanceof/typeof instead of deprecated util.isRegExp()
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11381
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
