Use "Long Term Support" rather than "long term support".
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/38839#issuecomment-850853132
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/38841
Reviewed-By: Derek Lewis <DerekNonGeneric@inf.is>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/37478
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
In the discussion of https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/35323
it was suggested that we should add some
additional context/clarification to the technical
values documented for the project.
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/36201
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/35323
Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <admin@stephenbelanger.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
We use _backward incompatible_ and _backwards incompatible_ with no
discernible pattern in the docs. Follow Chicago Manual of Style and also
our standardization on US English and favor _backward_.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/35243
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
Make the section a bit shorter and comply with minor elements of
Microsoft Style Guide.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/35242
Reviewed-By: Mary Marchini <oss@mmarchini.me>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
As part of the [next-10](https://github.com/nodejs/next-10) we found
we needed to capture the project's technical values/priorities as
a starting point before discussing key technologies/areas for the
next 10 years of Node.js
This is a first cut that the team put together. The discussion
took place in a few meetings as well as this
[PR](https://github.com/nodejs/next-10/pull/11). We believe the doc
should live in the core node repository as it is intended to
reflect the agreement of the collaborator base.
I think this is a good starting point but we also
acknowledge that only a small subset of the Node.js collaborators
have participated/commented so far. This PR should be a good
way to get additional review/input from the larger set
of Node.js collaborators.
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/35145
Reviewed-By: Christopher Hiller <boneskull@boneskull.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Beth Griggs <Bethany.Griggs@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <admin@stephenbelanger.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruy Adorno <ruyadorno@github.com>
Reviewed-By: Andrey Pechkurov <apechkurov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Ash Cripps <acripps@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Coe <bencoe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Pranshu Srivastava <rexagod@gmail.com>
